Unpacking the price hike: Are delivery partners delivering? 

IT’S BEEN almost seven months since the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia  Commission (MCMC) introduced a minimum parcel delivery cost, aimed at uplifting service  standards across the logistics sector.

This move, together with broader calls for innovation,  was expected to bring more transparency, efficiency, and consistency to the delivery  experience. 

Complementing this, MCMC rolled out a national consumer survey in May 2025 to gather  feedback from the public on their recent delivery experiences, from parcel handling, to  reliability, to cost.

Although the survey results are still pending, there are high expectations  that they will provide valuable insights into industry performance and indicate whether the  intended benefits are being felt. 

For everyday users like casual senders or small business owners, this period has raised a  common question: Has introducing a higher minimum delivery cost truly improved the  delivery experience? 

While progress is visible, frustrations around delays, parcel damages, or unclear tracking  still surface constantly in online chatter and customer feedback.

With delivery partners  already adjusting their fees, many are quietly wondering: Are these added costs bringing  noticeable improvements, or are the same issues just being repackaged? 

More critically, some service providers have already demonstrated their ability to offer  reliable service and tracking at affordable prices, a lifeline for SMEs and consumers,  especially those in rural areas.

This raises the question of whether a blanket price guideline  increase was truly necessary, or if it inadvertently burdens those who rely on accessible, low cost delivery.

As Malaysia’s e-commerce landscape matures, delivery has become more than just a  transaction – it’s part of the customer journey.

This makes it all the more important to reflect  on whether current systems are evolving fast enough to meet rising expectations. 

Ultimately, the spotlight will soon turn to the MCMC’s survey findings, which could offer a  clearer picture of where we stand, and what more needs to be done to build trust and quality  in every parcel that moves across the country. 

What Rising Delivery Costs Mean for E-Commerce 

In Malaysia’s booming e-commerce scene, delivery services form a crucial aspect of the  entire shopping experience.

For micro, small, and even mid-sized businesses, delivery  accounts for a significant chunk of operational cost – according to a Milieu Insight survey  which found that over 52% of sellers spend more than 10% of their operational budget on  shipping, with 54% in urban areas reaching that level. 

But while surcharges and delivery rates continue to climb, the returns in reliability,  consistency, and quality of service leave much to be desired.

The question sellers and  consumers are asking more urgently than ever is: delivery costs are rising – but is the  service keeping pace, especially when more affordable and dependable alternatives already exist? 

When Delivery Breaks Trust 

Today, consumers don’t just expect fast delivery – they expect value for their money, which  essentially means precise and accessible tracking, predictable arrival times, and the safe  arrival of parcels.

Among the top factors that influence online shopping decisions,  consumers consistently prioritise price, followed closely by delivery speed and reliability. 

Yet, many delivery partners continue to face widespread criticism: 57% of shoppers say they  are only ‘somewhat satisfied’ with parcel deliveries, while 64% believe fees should be lower.

This sentiment is particularly strong among low-income buyers and those in rural areas who  often prioritise affordability and accessibility over premium features. They are the ones who  feel the pinch of price increases most acutely. However, the criticism doesn’t stop there. 

For sellers, late or damaged deliveries will lead to negative shop reviews, increased refund  requests, and the loss of their customer base.

For consumers, a single bad experience can  lead to abandoning not just the seller, but e-commerce altogether.

In this high–stakes  environment, delivery is no longer just about logistics: it is a make-or-break brand  experience. 

The Innovation Gap 

Malaysia’s logistics sector is going through a major upgrade in response to rising pressure  and demand, with established companies and new players investing heavily in better  technology and infrastructure. 

A big focus across the industry is the rollout of real-time tracking, smarter route planning, and better handling right up until the parcel reaches your doorstep, all to make the process  more transparent and reliable for businesses and buyers alike. 

Besides leveraging AI to plan faster delivery routes and the adoption of digital systems for  enhanced inventory tracking, some companies are also exploring eco-friendly practices like  utilising solar-powered vehicles and electric delivery fleets. 

With upgraded warehouses and improved delivery coordination, these efforts are designed  to meet the growing expectations of the Malaysian market.

More importantly, delivery  providers like J&T, SPX Express, GDEX, Ninja Van, and more are working to align their delivery fees with better service and greater reliability, often through tailored solutions for businesses  of all sizes, ranging from large enterprises to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and  micro sellers. 

It’s worth noting, however, that consumers have pointed out that affordability and quality are  not mutually exclusive.

Some have highlighted that many providers have been delivering  reliable service with effective tracking even before the recent price adjustment guidelines. 

These providers have been crucial in supporting SMEs and consumers, particularly in  underserved rural areas, by keeping costs manageable. 

Yet, service quality can vary significantly by region or local courier. As delivery rates and  surcharges climb, buyers continue to report frequent late deliveries, damaged items, and  frustrating tracking inconsistencies: proof that basic pain points remain unresolved for many  consumers and sellers despite the investments. Therefore, it is critical to question whether  these upgrades are reaching the right users. 

A closer look into the industry will reveal the truth: technological upgrades don’t necessarily  prevent parcels from being mishandled or abandoned, yet sellers are left to absorb losses  and risk customer loyalty.

With SST revisions in mid-2024 and inflation biting, the ripple  effects are clear: some sellers willingly absorb losses to maintain pricing, while others are  seeing buyers drop off entirely, unwilling to continue paying more for a delivery system that  still seems broken. 

The Real Risk: Undermining E-Commerce Growth 

Inconsistent delivery experiences don’t just hurt businesses; they chip away at trust in the  e-commerce model itself. 

Most consumers don’t consider the provider’s origin; they simply want the parcel to arrive  on time, intact, and without surprise charges. Yet, rising costs amid inconsistent standards 

across delivery partners make it hard for consumers to maintain confidence, or for sellers to  retain loyalty. 

For large platforms and enterprise sellers, premium-tier courier partnerships may offer a  competitive advantage.

However, for small merchants who form the backbone of Malaysia’s  digital economy, access to high-performing, affordable logistics remains challenging.

The  concern is that a universal increase in delivery costs could inadvertently penalise those  reliable, cost-effective providers and the consumers who depend on them, stifling e-commerce growth in areas where affordability is paramount. 

What This Means Today 

Consumers: Delivery should be evaluated across all major providers – Pos Malaysia, Ninja  Van, SPX, J&T, GDEX, Lazada, Shopee, Grab – paying close attention to reliability and cost  fairness. It’s important to recognise that good delivery service isn’t necessarily the most  expensive. 

Sellers: With over half spending more than 10% of operating costs on logistics, it’s essential  to assess if premium payments truly lead to better fulfillment, especially for smaller players. 

They must also consider if their current cost-effective delivery partners are still viable  options, or if rising delivery rates are forcing them to compromise on affordability for their  customers. 

Providers and Regulators: If regulated pricing is not matched with consistent service, trust  in the entire e-commerce system may erode.

The MCMC survey results could offer  actionable feedback for industry-wide reform, particularly in distinguishing between  providers who truly need the increased revenue to improve services and those who have  already achieved high standards at competitive prices.

Weighing Progress Against Impact 

For delivery partners, it may be time to re-evaluate whether their current offerings are  inclusive, and more importantly, if they are able to address the biggest concerns that the  industry has at large when it comes to the provision of delivery services.

As the logistics  sector pushes forward, will businesses and consumers truly benefit from higher delivery  costs – or are we setting ourselves up for a mismatch between payment and performance? 

Because when delivery disappoints, it’s not just parcels that are delayed – it’s trust, growth,  and the promise of Malaysia’s digital economy. —July 2, 2025

 

Subscribe and get top news delivered to your Inbox everyday for FREE