Corruption has no race or religion

WHENEVER corruption dominates the headlines in Malaysia, the conversation often drifts in a familiar direction. Instead of focusing on accountability and institutional failures, it becomes a debate about which community is supposedly more corrupt.

That is exactly the wrong conversation.

PAS president Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang recently argued that Muslims are less likely to be involved in corruption because their faith makes them accountable to God, while suggesting that non-Muslims are more prone to corruption. He did not present statistical evidence to support those claims.

Faith can influence personal choices. Every major religion teaches honesty, justice and responsibility. But personal moral principles are not the same as evidence about entire communities.

If Muslims are supposedly less corrupt, where is the data? If non-Muslims are supposedly more involved, where are the independently verified numbers?

Without evidence, this stops being a discussion about corruption and becomes a competition over moral superiority.

Malaysia deserves better than that.

Corruption is not a Malay problem, a Chinese problem, an Indian problem, a Muslim problem or a non-Muslim problem. It is a human problem. More importantly, it is an institutional problem.

A corrupt Muslim remains corrupt. A corrupt non-Muslim remains corrupt. An honest Muslim deserves respect for their integrity, just as an honest non-Muslim does.

The law should ask one question: Did this person commit corruption, and can it be proven?

It should not ask about religion, race or political affiliation.

That principle matters whether the institution involved is Tabung Haji, a government-linked company, a ministry or a private corporation.

Investigating wrongdoing should never be mistaken for attacking a religion, nor should political convenience determine whether scrutiny takes place.

The standard should be the same everywhere.

To be fair, Hadi raises one question worth examining: is anti-corruption enforcement applied consistently?

That is a legitimate question in any democracy.

Are powerful people treated differently from ordinary citizens? Do investigations stall when influential names emerge? Do political connections affect enforcement? Are both those who offer bribes and those who accept them pursued with equal determination?

Those questions require evidence, transparency and independent scrutiny. They cannot be answered through racial or religious assumptions.

Malaysia has made some progress. In the Corruption Perceptions Index 2025, Transparency International raised Malaysia’s score from 50 to 52, improving its ranking to 54th out of 182 countries.

But Transparency International Malaysia itself described the improvement as “a step forward rather than a turning point”, underscoring that deeper institutional reforms remain necessary.

That is where the real work lies.

Malaysia needs transparent procurement processes, genuinely independent enforcement agencies, stronger whistleblower protection, clearer political financing rules, meaningful conflict-of-interest safeguards and public officials who are accountable regardless of their status or connections.

Faith can strengthen a person’s conscience but faith should inspire integrity, not become an immunity certificate.

Likewise, exposing corruption should reveal wrongdoing, not become a weapon for humiliating another community.

The Malaysia worth building is one where integrity is measured by conduct, not identity.

Instead of asking which community is more corrupt, we should ask harder questions: Who benefits from corruption? Who enables it? Who protects the corrupt? Why do institutions allow it to happen? And how can we make corruption harder to commit and harder to hide?

That is the conversation of a mature democracy.

We do not need a contest over which community is morally superior. We need a culture where no one is above scrutiny, no one is beneath justice, and no identity card provides either protection from accountability or grounds for suspicion.

Corruption should be colour-blind, religion-blind and party-blind. That is how integrity becomes genuinely Malaysian. ‒ Aug 21, 2026

 

KT Maran is a Focus Malaysia viewer.

The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.

 

Main image: The Edge Malaysia

Subscribe and get top news delivered to your Inbox everyday for FREE