RECENTLY, the Armed Forces Fund Board’s (LTAT) announced that it aims to assign 30% of its public equity allocation for foreign investments. For an entity that manages close to RM10 bil, this is a move in the right direction.
One does not have to look far to understand why. Malaysia’s corporate sector can be notorious for mismanagement. In fact, our public equity and capital markets are going through much turbulence right now.
The mess left by Sapura Energy Bhd and Serba Dinamik Holdings Bhd have eroded public confidence in Corporate Malaysia due to chronic lack of accountability.
By raising the ceiling for foreign equity, LTAT is sending the message that it is prepared to embrace the culture and corporate rigour that are often associated with foreign funds.
While there are exceptions to the rule, foreign funds tend to gravitate towards corporate accountability and good governance. This stands in stark contrast with some of the local corporate shenanigans that have surfaced of late.
One example is the Norges Bank Investment Management (NMIB), the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund. It is no surprise that Malaysians are drawn to the Norwegian Government’s pension funds which reportedly hold on average 1% of the world’s shares.
The secret? It works with reason and facts, not succumbing to political pressure, greed and misguided priorities. It is managed in a transparent and open manner with a defined set of principles which guide investment strategy.
Malaysian Corporate Shame #1: Sapura Energy
But in Malaysia, despite widespread unease among fund managers, the powers-that-be are able to make decisions to the detriment of depositors such as when Permodalan Nasional Bhd’s (PNB) board of directors decided to participate in a fund-raising exercise at Sapura Energy in 2019.
Once held up as a shining example of Malay entrepreneurship for being the world’s second largest integrated oil and gas (O&G) service provider, the group has suffered greatly since oil prices crashed in 2014.
However, it is clear that not every stakeholder has suffered equally, with ex-CEO Tan Sri Shahril Shamsuddin earning a whopping RM443.9 mil from 2013 to 2021 – or an average of RM49.3 mil per year for nine years – excluding the “intellectual property rights, trademarks and branding” fees as well as related-party transactions.
While PNB’s 40% stake in the company is often cited as the key reason for a bailout, we should not ignore the bad strategic decisions made by the company.
This includes the company’s acquisition of Seadrill’s drilling assets in 2013, which gave Sapura Energy a 55% share of the global tender rig market, but also severely stretched the company’s finances.
Sapura Energy was a slow burn (and avoidable) crisis waiting to happen. In 2018, shareholders, including the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) voted against the re-appointment of all the company’s directors, including Shahril, perhaps in an attempt to force accountability upon those who have made strategic mistakes.
However, the bid to oust Shahril failed and EPF ceased to be a substantial shareholder.
Malaysian Corporate Shame #2: Serba Dinamik
The Edge has reported that the Securities Commission (SC) found 59 company and personal stamps of external parties in a box at Serba Dinamik Bhd’s office with some of the stamps including prominent companies such as Petronas Gas Bhd, Exxonmobil Exploration and Sabah Shell Petroleum Co Ltd.
Many other discoveries, which in the normal course of business would raise red flags, were also seen in the court documents filed last November by regulator Bursa Malaysia. Yet it seems that the number of red flags are clearly inferior to the number of closed eyes and empty skulls.
More regrettably is the Attorney-General’s (AG) failure to prosecute the perpetrators although this is in line with Article 145 (3) of the Federal Constitution.
The move to drop the charges against Serba Dinamik and its officials under the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) in favour of a compound of RM3 mil (per offender or RM16 mil in total) implies that Malaysia allows powerful individuals to allegedly falsify numbers and documents (to the tune of RM6 bil) and not serve a day in jail.
How do we promote accountability when bad decisions are tolerated and those engaged in fraudulent practices are given the “get out of jail” card? Such (in)actions by those in power will simply reinforce a vicious cycle which promotes mediocrity and hinders progress.
Transparency, good governance and rule of law, building blocks of trust and confidence, are severely lacking in corporate Malaysia today. This is partly a legacy issue but foreign equity can help turn the tide.
For those reasons, kudos to LTAT for looking outwards and taking one step away from our domestic market whose integrity appears to be increasingly compromised. Godspeed, LTAT! – May 27, 2022
Julian Sng
Klang
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
