Netizens defending SJKC’s proficiency in teaching Bahasa Malaysia

THE debate on continuing the vernacular schools in Malaysia is never-ending, with some saying these schools are separating Malaysians from each other while others say that they are generally more efficient than the national schools.

A post by a political activist from the Perikatan Nasional (PN) opposition camp, Jauhari Johar has gained attention on the X platform.

He said he is in agreement with Ridhuan Tee that the Bahasa Melayu or Bahasa Malaysia as it is called nowadays, being taught in vernacular schools is not up to the standards of the national schools.

For that matter, he urged the Chinese community to have some serious discussion amongst themselves about the relevance of vernacular schools in modern Malaysia.

As the debate among netizens unfolds, it raises fundamental questions about the intersection of education, identity, and social cohesion in multicultural societies.

Some users, in response to the post, said students have to pass BM before they can be promoted to the next standard. If they fail, they have a chance to retake the BM exam but if they continue to fail, they will be in the same standard for another year.

Other users pointed out that it is required for all students who are sitting for SPM to pass their Bahasa Malaysia subject.

Others state that some students from these schools may not be able to speak our national language well, and they could be dropouts from the school. Others say students from Sekolah Kebangsaan also have issues, arguing that some cannot even write proper official letters.

Those who agree with the statement that SJKC does not teach BM well argue that it explains why many of these school graduates could not speak Bahasa properly, but that does not mean going to the vernacular schools should make them poor at expressing themselves in BM. – March 17, 2024

Subscribe and get top news delivered to your Inbox everyday for FREE