By Jamari Mohtar
THE gauntlet thrown by former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz with his spurious claims on Government loans and debts was answered like a true fighter for the truth by the latter.
In his Facebook post, Najib claimed the Government has incurred loans amounting to RM115.53 bil as of May 22 and gave a list of the monthly breakdown of the loans from January, and was ready to be investigated under the fake news Emergency Ordinance if the list is proven false.
He went on to say it is the right of the Government to borrow RM115.53 bil since the beginning of this year and spend it according to its whims and fancies after the Finance Act that controls and monitors Government expenditures has been suspended through an Emergency Ordinance.
On May 26, Tengku Zafrul responded that as of April 2021. Government loans amounted to RM81.8 bil and about RM99.3 bil as of this month, not RM115.53 bill as Najib claimed.
Apparently, Najib has fudged the number by including loans raised by Petronas and Khazanah Nasional Bhd, as well as proceeds from the sale of stakes in Telekom Malaysia Bhd and SilTerra Malaysia Sdn Bhd for their respective capital and cash flow requirements, and the Government’s use of the National Trust Fund (KWAN).
All the above, strictly speaking, are not Government loans.
“I find the inclusion of such loans and sale of assets extremely puzzling. How can such loans made by Petronas and Khazanah count towards Government debt? These loans were made for their capital and cashflow requirements,” Tengku Zafrul said in a Facebook post.
“These are debts that Petronas and Khazanah are fully responsible for. How can you consider borrowings by such entities as Federal Government’s debt?”
According to Zafrul, since January, all Government loans have been made based on the expenditure approved via Budget 2021 in Parliament. There have been no additional funds as alleged by Najib, except for the usual government revenue which has since decreased significantly due to the pandemic.
“Additionally, the Government has never used the Emergency Ordinance as a way to increase Government expenditure or increase the statutory debt limit set by Parliament in August 2020,’’ Zafrul added.
As for the RM5 bil drawn from the KWAN fund, it will be used mainly for purchasing vaccines. It is not a loan; it is Government reserves built over the years since the 1960s for use by future government and the Muhyiddin’s administration is not the first to use the KWAN reserves.
On the RM81.8 bil loans that have accumulated as of April, Tengku Zafrul explained it comprises RM36.1 bil to refinance debts that have reached maturity, while RM50.2 bil is used as development expenditure which includes expenditure from the Kumpulan Wang COVID-19, of which RM17 bil is for 2021.
This encompasses initiatives such as Bantuan Prihatin Rakyat, Wage Subsidy Programme, Jaringan Prihatin and Program Belia either completed (monies used already), or about to be launched throughout movement control order (MCO 2.0) and MCO 3.0 this year (monies still available).
Kumpulan Wang COVID-19 was established from the proceeds of the Government’s RM666 mil Sukuk Prihatin launched on Aug 18.
Tengku Zafrul also clarified on some issues Najib has been misrepresenting the public. One of these is the fact the Government has never made any borrowings outside its annual Budget or off-balance sheet borrowings, unlike the Najib administration which racked up an off-balance sheet financing amounting to RM50 bil.
What’s more, between 2008 and 2017 under Najib’s administration, the Federal Government debt level rose over 120%, but most significantly Government guarantees rose by over 240%.
The contingent liabilities of a high Government guarantees and off-balance sheet borrowings of the Najib’s administration burst asunder with the infamous 1MDB fiasco whose ramifications are still being felt today when the present Government has to shoulder a lot of legacy debts by 1MDB, SRC (SRC International Sdn Bhd), SSER (Suria Strategic Energy Resources Sdn Bhd), etc.
Tengku Zafrul explained that a lot of the Government funds are used for servicing these liabilities – approximately 15% of all Government’s debt is in the form of 1MDB’s guarantee and debt commitments. In short, the PN Government has inherited a large amount of debt but currently faced with a lower capacity to meet these financial commitments.
Contrary to what Najib claimed over and over again, that the Government –since the time of Pakatan Harapan (PH) – has not paid a single cent of the 1MDB debt as according to him, 1MDB left behind assets plus the funds garnered from its asset recovery efforts that can be used to pay off its debt.
Tengku Zafrul pointed out that the Government has repaid RM12.4 bil of 1MDB debt and RM3.1 bil of SRC debt, “and yet we still have to settle the principal as well as coupon, profit or interest payment for the bonds, sukuk and term loans amounting to RM39.8 bil for 1MDB and RM2.7 bil for SRC”.
Thus, besides the federal debt, the Government also has to honour guarantee commitments for 1MDB, SRC and SSER. Again, contrary to what Najib said, these projects do not generate income to settle their loan principal and interest. “What is even more saddening is that in most cases, we don’t even know what benefits these debts have given to the country,” added Zafrul.
If there is no 1MDB fiasco, these billions of debts could have been used to benefit the rakyat during the pandemic, and in this it shows how unremorseful Najib is in bringing down the country into the abyss.
One devious tactic used by Najib to confuse the rakyat is his insistence that Government debt has breached the 60% threshold agreed to by Parliament when what the Government and Parliament have in mind is statutory debt, not just any debt, which remains near 60% but still below 60%.
Also, the rakyat must know loans used to support Government initiatives and programmes are recorded in the Government’s financial statements and subjected to annual audit. – May 28, 2021
Jamari Mohtar is Director of Media & Communications at EMIR Research, an independent think-tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based upon rigorous research.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Photo credit: NST
