THE release of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) 2025 marks a pivotal moment in the United Kingdom’s (UK) military and strategic recalibration.
It outlines a vision of a more agile, AI-enabled, and technologically dominant force, prepared for high-intensity conflicts and grey-zone threats alike. It doubles down on NATO leadership, increases readiness postures, and makes heavy commitments to defence industrial growth, innovation, and autonomy.
For Malaysia, while the geostrategic theatre differs significantly from Europe, the undercurrents of SDR 2025 are deeply relevant.
The Indo-Pacific is undergoing its own transformation: rising great power competition, cyber threats, grey-zone coercion, and the militarisation of disputed maritime areas particularly in the South China Sea.
As such, the SDR 2025 offers critical lessons for Malaysia to consider, both in structure and substance.
Increased readiness and force modernisation
The UK’s focus on “readiness at scale” centres on enhancing the ability to rapidly deploy forces, shorten mobilisation timelines, and maintain equipment and personnel at a high level of combat preparedness.
This strategic shift is supported by significant investments in logistics resilience, rapid deployment infrastructure, and a more capable reserve force, enabling the UK to respond swiftly and effectively to emerging threats across multiple domains.
In contrast, Malaysia’s current defence posture remains primarily oriented toward peacetime deterrence, border security, and internal stability.
This traditional approach is increasingly insufficient given the growing complexity of regional security dynamics, particularly in the maritime domain and the broader Indo-Pacific theatre.
To meet these evolving challenges, Malaysia must undertake a substantial recalibration of its force readiness model.
One key step is to establish modular, rapid-reaction units that are capable of operating in hybrid threat environments.
These units should be designed for quick deployment and tailored for operations in and around critical maritime choke-points such as the Strait of Malacca, where the risk of grey-zone activities and asymmetric threats is rising.
Furthermore, Malaysia should increase investments in military mobility and logistics infrastructure, particularly in East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak) due to their proximity to potential flash-points in the South China Sea.
Pre-positioned supplies, forward-operating facilities, and improved transport networks would significantly enhance operational flexibility and response times.
Therefore, the expansion and modernisation of the Territorial Army (Askar Wataniah) should be a priority.
This includes not only strengthening traditional reserve components but also creating new hybrid reserve forces trained in emerging domains such as cyber operations, drone warfare, and electronic warfare.
These capabilities would allow Malaysia to build a more adaptive, resilient force structure better suited to the demands of modern conflict.
Technology-led warfare and AI integration
The SDR 2025 places strong emphasis on artificial intelligence (AI), drones, uncrewed systems, and data as the foundation of modern combat power.
The United Kingdom is actively investing in these areas, establishing a Defence Uncrewed Systems Centre, accelerating AI integration across all military domains, and expanding its arsenal of autonomous platforms, ranging from underwater drones to AI-powered intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems.
Malaysia, however, remains behind the curve in adopting these transformative technologies. AI integration into defence systems, local drone manufacturing, and the digitalisation of battlefield operations are all still in their infancy.
To address this gap, Malaysia must begin by establishing a dedicated Malaysian Defence AI Centre. This entity is potentially housed under the Defence Ministry’s Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE) that could serve as the central hub for AI projects, defence-focused data analytics, and the coordination of emerging technology initiatives.
Alongside this, Malaysia should develop a comprehensive national drone strategy tailored for defence needs.
This strategy should prioritise the development and deployment of surveillance UAVs to enhance maritime domain awareness, particularly in contested waters, and explore capabilities such as loitering munitions and AI-assisted targeting systems to bolster operational effectiveness.
Equally important is fostering a defence innovation ecosystem. Malaysia should incentivise local tech startups, university spin-offs, and research institutions to co-develop dual-use technologies that can be rapidly prototyped, tested, and fielded.
Lessons can be drawn from Ukraine’s model of agile defence innovation, where close collaboration between the military and civilian tech sectors has yielded impactful solutions in record time.
Embracing such a model would position Malaysia to better respond to the fast-evolving nature of future warfare.
A moment for strategic courage
SDR 2025 serves as more than just a roadmap for the UK’s military development as it signals a broader transformation in global defence thinking.
The future of warfare is increasingly defined by digital technologies, autonomous systems, and resilient multinational alliances.
While Malaysia may be geographically distant from NATO’s operational theatres, it is undeniably situated within the Indo-Pacific, a region at the heart of emerging strategic competition.
To remain relevant, secure, and operationally capable in this rapidly evolving environment, Malaysia must embrace a fundamental shift in its defence posture.
This requires thinking innovatively, investing decisively in next-generation capabilities, partnering strategically with like-minded nations, and modernising urgently across all domains i.e., land, sea, air, cyber, and space. ‒ June 24, 2025
R. Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters.
The views expressed are solely of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Pipeline Journal
