“Golden Age Pension: Spurring birth rate and revitalising rural economy”

FOR decades, the issue of old age poverty had been left unaddressed and have become a chronic national crisis. According to Employees Provident Fund (EPF), about 13.6 million of its members cannot afford to retire. That figure does not include precarious workers and agri-food producers.  

The rising old age poverty can be address by introducing Golden Age Pension (GAP). The society needs to weigh the overall benefits of such social advancement policy. 

 GAP slows down ageing society 

According to World Bank, Malaysia will become a “super-aged society” as 20% of the population will be above the age of 65 years old by 2056. This megatrend is caused by rising life expectancy microtrend, coupled with declining birth rate microtrend. Since 2013, Malaysia’s fertility rate had fallen below the replacement rate of 2.0 child per women. 

Young adults born after 1983s are saddled with student loan, rising housing prices, soaring inflation, stagnant wages and job insecurity. This is a direct impact of privatisation and liberalisation during Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s first regime. Such polices usually takes about one generation (30 years) to impact the national fertility rate. 

In the Asian culture, children are expected to provide for their financially insecure elderly parents, increasing the financial stress on working adult.  Henceforth, youths are getting married older and bearing less child to avoid deeper financial stress. The trend of childless couples is rising exponentially not purely because of choice but because of cost. This is where GAP will ease the financial stress on young adults to allow fertility rates to rise again.  

GAP speeds up modernisation 

Senior citizens usually tend to resist new technology. One example is taxi drivers being against e-hailing drivers. Meanwhile, senior citizens owned small businesses tend to resist strategic infrastructure projects such as widening of roads, realignment of railways, urban redevelopment etc. These senior citizens resist and agitate against progress to protect their “bread and butter”. 

Small businesses and taxi drivers earn too little to save or invest for old age, so they work to death. The loss of existing means of production will make their life more miserable. Henceforth, senior citizens “stand and fight” against modernisation which does not benefit them because it would be death knell for them. With GAP in place, it will allow senior citizens to accept progress and speed up modernisation of Malaysia. 

GAP reduces food prices 

Senior citizens with smallholder agriculture lands and sea-fishing licenses are surviving by renting out their lands and boats, respectively, to young people and undocumented migrants. The senior citizens will neither surrender nor allow new sea-fishing boats or farming land to come by to protect their meagre rental income.  

The “rent-to-live” introduces new input cost on agriculture produces increasing food prices. GAP will dismantle the resistances to allow lands and boats to move into the hand of next generation without rental cost. 

GAP reduces inequality 

GAP provides income for senior citizens in small towns and rural suburbs. This increases the base disposable income in those towns and rural areas which increase productive spending on essentials such as foods, groceries and home repairs. Subsequently, creating and sustaining small business and jobs to narrow the urban-rural inequality. 

Rising labour surplus caused by rural to urban migration coupled with absence of collective bargaining stalls wage growth, widening inequality between labour and capital. GAP creates and sustains small business and jobs in small towns and rural area to reduce rural to urban migration, putting upward pressure on the wages. Henceforth, GAP will narrow labour-capital inequality. 

GAP reduce homelessness & begging 

Contrary to mainstream narratives, the old-age homelessness and begging are not rooted in laziness. Since the 1980s, the Government forced industrial workers to accept low wages and poor working conditions to allow Malaysia to “get rich first”. The low salary prevented them from saving for retirement or purchasing a home. Meanwhile, many of the former high-risk industry workers were unable to bear children due to pollution and poor working conditions. 

These workers had sacrificed their life to make Malaysia the 40th richest country on Earth. Today, the senior citizens are left to live and/or beg on streets. Meanwhile, certain right-wing politicians labelled the senior citizens as lazy to avoid taking responsibility over their plight. GAP will end old age homelessness and begging for good.  

Moving forward 

There is need for different intervention mechanism such as GAP to close the income gap between working age and the elderly. The discussed benefits of GAP onto our society are merely to tip of the iceberg. The Government could introduce GAP and it can be funded using the Capital Gain Tax (CGT) on the ultra-rich.  

The World Bank highlighted in its Economic Monitor (December 2021) that Malaysia had achieved the material condition to tax capital gains and inheritances as form of redistributive mechanism. Hence, introducing CGT would not impact 99% of the population compared to regressive Good & Service Tax (GST). – May 10, 2022.  

 

Sharan Raj is a human rights activist, environmentalist and infrastructure policy analyst. 

The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.

 

Subscribe and get top news delivered to your Inbox everyday for FREE